Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 5,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
HOLDER'S FOIA MEMO IS A CRITICAL ABOUT-FACE FROM JOHN ASHCROFT'S FOIA DIRECTIVE. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
Unfortunately for all involved this muppet had already got a patent for the product 10 years previous when he worked for a different firm, the IPO have confirmed that the Rapstrap "falls within the scope of claims 1 and 5 of the patent," what action is taken remains to be seen.The ever reliable IPKat features two cases that caught IP Freely's eye: the Google France v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 1:25 pm
In JB v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
A deferential approach in this context is consistent with the commonsense understanding that “[t]he war power of the national government ‘is the power to wage war successfully,’” Lichter v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 6:55 am
(C.M.) v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 12:45 pm
Under Saffer v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 pm
He turned them over to U.S. custody – apparently for bounty money that American officials were paying for suspected terrorists. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:17 pm
The decision in Warren v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:55 pm
United States, and Perry v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court decided Negusie v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 pm
This week, the Supreme Court took the rare step of deciding an asylum case, Negusie v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:49 am
It's like not voting for McCain in a two-person contest simply because you're convinced he'll never win. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:50 am
Katz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:53 pm
The article discusses a recent California district court decision, Lenz v. [read post]
