Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 5361 - 5380 of 6,156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2015, 4:05 pm by Guest & Gray
While living together it must also be shown that both persons represented to others in the community that they are husband and wife. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:38 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
// What happens when a judgment creditor holding a judgment against only one spouse levies on their joint bank account and moves for turnover of 100% of the funds in the account - should the husband and wife kiss all the money goodbye? [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:52 pm by Giles Peaker
While she was ‘a member of the tenant’s family by HA 1985 s.113(1)(a) he is the spouse or civil partner of that person, or he and that person live together as husband and wife or as if they were civil partners, she had not resided with the tenant for the 12 months before Mr D’s death, so did not fall under this definition. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:14 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
  The facts of the case were egregious:  The Plaintiff’s late husband, John K. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:56 am by Abbe Gluck
          Before the final cases of the Term overtake us, it is worth pausing a moment on the connection shared by three cases handed down earlier this month, each about radically different subjects, but giving rise to the same misunderstandings about statutory interpretation: Bond(about the reach of the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act to a wife's attempt to injure her husbands… [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
Laws regulating roles within marriage were rooted in the common law doctrine of coverture, which provided that a wifes legal identity merged with her husbands. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
Laws regulating roles within marriage were rooted in the common law doctrine of coverture, which provided that a wifes legal identity merged with her husbands. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am by Peter J. Sluka
Based on my review of the caselaw, courts that consider a non-party’s request to intervene in a dissolution proceeding under CPLR 1012 or 1013 (the general intervenor statutes) tend to allow intervention only by owners or potential owners of the business (compare Matter of Karl Springer Woodworking, Ltd., 148 Misc 2d 626, 628 [Sup Ct 1990] [allowing wife to intervene in dissolution proceeding of husbands woodworking business where ownership was… [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 10:34 am
The suit seeks compensation for ongoing medical treatment, mental anguish and a claim by his wife "for the loss of certain services from her husband. [read post]