Search for: "In re An. C." Results 5361 - 5380 of 28,780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2008, 8:57 pm
The C-SPAN cameras have been shut off (C-SPAN has no control over them), the Democratic leadership made the sergeant-at-arms kill the microphones, and they even at one point tried to turn off the lights. [read post]
I earlier wrote that “The three primary statutes protect protect cash value where (1) the policy prohibits assignment (GLM c 175 sec 119A; In re Shloss, 279 B.R. 6 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
  And the public's probably pretty happy with the hypertechnical way the Court figures out the meaning of that word.The question is a simple one:  Are you shooting "at" an occupied motor vehicle when:(A) You and the gun you're firing are outside the vehicle you're shooting "at";(B) Your hand and the gun are inside the vehicle you're shooting "at" but the rest of your body is outside it;… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:04 pm
For a complete discussion of the circuit split regarding the different injury requirements under § 1962(a-c), see Lockheed Martin, 357 F.Supp.2d at 1368-1371 ("If plaintiff's reinvestment injury concept were accepted, almost every pattern of racketeering activity by a corporation would be actionable under § 1962(a), and distinction between § 1962(a) and § 1962(c) would be meaningless. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Family judges, such as those in the Court of Appeal in Re T and in B and C (above) should be publicising the names of the people who are abusing their partners and children, and for one of the reasons that Charlie Pearce’s name was publicised. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
They do their own screening of IP rights, and are generally cautious b/c they’re academic institutions. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 12:16 pm by Andreea Rusu
L’auteure désire remercier Marc-Antoine Jutras, stagiaire en droit, pour son aide dans la préparation de cet article [1] 2022 QCCA 903. [2] RLRQ c A-3.001. [3] RLRQ c T-15.1. [4] Soulières c. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Democrats favor full-blown marijuana legalization (they're already spending the tax money!) [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Is it b/c they just gave up b/c disclaimer wasn’t enough? [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Very different definition of trade secret would be required.Lemley: the things you’re drawing from © are not from substantial similarity; they’re from fair use. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
And when they're caught driving without a license a second time, they're charged with a Class B misdemeanor, meaning police arrest them and counties must pay for incarceration and indigent defense costs. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 10:08 am by Krzysztof Pacula
Written by María Barral Martínez, a former trainee at the European Court of Justice (Chambers of AG Campos Sánchez-Bordona) and an alumna of the University of Amsterdam and the University of Santiago de Compostela The Hoge Raad Neederlanden (The Dutch Supreme Court), the referring court in the case Supreme Site Service and Others, C-186/19, harbours doubts regarding the international jurisdiction of Dutch courts under the Brussels I bis Regulation, in respect to a… [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:55 am by Holly Brezee
In most federal civil litigations, determining proper venue is governed by the general venue statute at Section 1391(c) of Title 28 of the U.S. [read post]