Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 7,331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 5:36 pm
In Czyzewski v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am
Likewise, the 1879 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Franita Tolson – In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
” Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, and citing Diamond v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:28 am
Writing for the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated that the Colorado Constitution “classifies homosexuals not to further a proper legislative end but to make them unequal to everyone else. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm
Kennedy. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:03 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison looks at the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:55 am
In Lafler v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:42 am
Arizona in light of the Court’s recent decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
Following reasoning from the Kennedy-Ginsburg concurrence in Denver Area, it said the channel functioned as a public forum, and its operators as state actors. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
He repeatedly uses terms like enlisting the state to “stamp out any subculture and make its members outcasts. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:57 pm
From early on in Monday’s oral argument in Coleman-Bey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
Stone wrote in the wake of Gonzales v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
In another note of distinction, Secretary Cortés-Vázquez is proud to be the first Hispanic to hold the position of Secretary of State of New York. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
It is also manifest in the substance of his opinions, as evidenced by what he wrote in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:52 am
I just returned from this morning’s oral argument in Department of HHS v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
At the oral argument Monday morning in TC Heartland v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
In a sweeping and ennobling opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
