Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 5361 - 5380 of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
  Well, now there is: Today, the Court of Appeal decided in  Duale v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(ITC Law Blog)   US Patents – Decisions District Court S D Florida on motions to stay pending re-examination: Fusilamp LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Cargotec USA, Inc., No. 2:10-CV-236, 2011 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
With the denial of review in Philip Morris USA, et al., v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
  Of course, the Pennsylvania case law in the 1980? [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC, 18-1048 Issue: Whether the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards permits a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement to compel arbitration based on the doctrine of equitable estoppel. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under the law of contracts, there is case law holding that “actual damages are not an essential element, and nominal damages are recoverable to vindicate contract rights” (Perry v McMahan, 164 AD3d 1488 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 A second subsidiary was also gobbled up along the way: a Bank of America subsidiary that actually went by that name, with (USA) in its name, located a bit further down South, in the dessert: Arizona. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:47 am by Steve Hall
"Justices not convinced by arguments to delay execution," by Joan Biskupic and Kevin Johnson for USA Today. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am by Andy
Some might argue that Patent law and the systems which regulate it are just as complicated (and as confusing to the layman?) [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]