Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 1:30 pm
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel The constitutional text looms large in the recess appointments case, NLRB v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:30 am
" Hendrik Hartog, Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty, Emeritus, author of Public Property and Private Power "The authors build their fascinating story case by case easily accessible to the lay reader. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:35 am
It was discovered in the V&A Archives (where the majority of Potter’s papers reside) in 2015 by an amazingly fortunate editor at publisher Penguin Random House Children’s. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 5:57 pm
Charles 'Lucky' LucianoUnited States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2006, 12:23 pm
In Part I, we layed out the basic framework of new 362(c)(3) and (c)(4) which restrict the applicability of the automatic stay to repeat filers, and discussed a few of the cases dealing with basic procedural issues under these new BAPCPA provisions. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Today’s metoclopramide case, Gardley-Starks v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 1:52 am
This, therefore, became (a) a very useful moment of self-analysis for Italian entrepreneurs, who are often accustomed to simply answering, when asked where the added value of their activities lays: “We have always done it this way”; (b) an important tool for litigation when a company wanted to claim in Court infringement or misappropriation of its trade secrets (especially ex parte). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:39 am
Zesty Paws LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
In Burke v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
This process lays to rest any doubts previously expressed about the extent of public participation (despite the National Assembly conducting several rounds of public participation on the CAB since its introduction, and amending the CAB accordingly). [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:00 pm
” Canada should take the lead from the United States federal court’s decision in Sandvig v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
What does it have to offer, if anything, about revising ideas about what we mean when we lay claim to translating ideas about social justice into laws? [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:44 am
As we revisit this law over the course of many hearings this year, we need to remember that this is not “Big Content v Big Tech” and ensure that users take center stage. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:07 am
Article 15(6) of the Directive lays down the rule that where, in the implementation of the right thus granted to broadcasters, compensation is provided for, it may not exceed the additional costs directly incurred in providing access to short extracts. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:20 am
Supreme Court is considering its ruling in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm
“A show about the law and the nine Supreme Court justices who interpret it for the rest of America,” episodes of note include The Fear of Too Much Justice on how the Supreme Court and the justice system treat people of color, the poor, and the sick and The Family Roe featuring a conversation with Joshua Prager who investigated and wrote a book on Roe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
Still, I do not believe that section 702, even understood correctly, satisfies the standards for privacy and data protection the CJEU lays out in Schrems. [read post]
