Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 5361 - 5380 of 12,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am by centerforartlaw
The three major types of IP laws—patent, trademark, and copyright—provide different levels of protection and rights. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Moreno-Florean, No. 07-50833 Sentence for attempted illegal reentry into the U.S. is vacated and remanded where: the elements of the crime in a prior state kidnapping conviction did not necessarily include the use of physical force, and so did not require a crime of violence enhancement to the base offense level. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Mark Lahn
People consume substances every day and face adverse consequences that they would never have voluntarily assumed. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 10:44 am by Stephen Bilkis
Although the defendant apparently urges that SORA classification procedures violate procedural due process, the New York Court of Appeals recently analyzed a claim with some similarity to the one here under the substantive due process doctrine in People v Knox. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Mark Lahn
People consume substances every day and face adverse consequences that they would never have voluntarily assumed. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
Again though they declined, which made him lose tremendous face in front of “his people. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am by Andrew Delaney
Not having any luck to speak of at the superior court level, he appeals. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm by David Super
      Several progressive scholars of late have endorsed holding an Article V convention. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:44 am by SHG
From the bench, Chief Justice John Roberts asked in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:28 am by SHG
The Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am by Andres
The issue then was incredibly important, imagine a world in which only the copyright owner can provide a valid link to content, this would cripple the Internet as we know it, as people would be afraid to link to content without authorisation. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 1:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
But that should never rise to the level of intimidation or harassment. [read post]