Search for: "People v. Waits"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 5,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2007, 3:27 pm
Ticconi v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
Pennsylvania v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
Regardless of what Stevens was asked during his confirmation hearings, Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:17 am
Wilkes v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 4:38 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 10:01 am
The BB theft response system quite literally punishes honesty - if someone admits to having stolen something, the employee is to immediately call the police and wait with the thief until their arrival, at which point said thief will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:31 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:05 am
For those of you who may not have been following Bloxham v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:34 am
Oh wait, Rhode Island jokes are not funny. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:28 pm
Taking a step back, if you have a visa petition pending based on employment, you can file for a green card but USCIS will not actually grant it to you until a certain waiting time is finished, because Congress made only a small number of slots available compared to all the people who want them.For family-based requests for green cards, the BIA has said it will not reopen a case for a pending green card application if the waiting time has not yet finished. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:44 pm
The newest salvo comes from Ohio, the land that gave us US v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:17 am
In a case that mentions Rambo and quotes from 12 Angry Men, a Ninth Circuit panel today in US v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 10:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 2:33 pm
Imagine that, the government steps in to give varying degrees of immunity and protections to tortfeasors, and people rush in to the protected palace of immunity. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
You can read the Murphy v IRS decision by clicking here. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 2:38 am
On Thursday, in People v Garbutt, 2007 NY Slip Op 05972 the Third Department held that it is an error of constitutional (see NY Const, art I, § 2) and statutory (see CPL 270.35 [1]) dimension to substitute an alternate juror for a regular juror after deliberations have commenced, without first obtaining a defendant's written consent. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 6:18 am
The case before the Court is not a situation where the agents could have impounded an area, such as a locker, until a warrant was obtained, see People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 9:55 am
CMS put its 2008 physician fee schedule "on display" last Monday; I was on the beach, so this post had to wait. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:00 am
"Wait! [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:58 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
