Search for: "Read v. United States"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 30,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2020, 9:04 pm
Another mechanism that might be involved in the dispersal of V. parahaemolyticus populations is the international trade of shellfish, which was suggested to facilitate the introduction of sequence type 36 into the United States and Spain. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:55 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 7:12 am
The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) has issued an interesting en banc (5-3) opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
NMCCA released its en banc reconsideration opinion today in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:02 am
Navy Times reports the NMCCA decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:01 am
In murder for hire trial, testimony that another person asked if declarant knew anyone who could complete the murder was admissible as a verbal act; any error in admitting the statement was harmless based on other evidence of guilt, in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:43 pm
United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 7:44 pm
Seventh Circuit notes verification of a "bait money" list three times a year was not a deficiency under FRE 803(6)'s "course of a regularly conducted business activity" requirement, in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:06 pm
While all await the decision of the panel in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:45 pm
Ruiz v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 6:53 am
Here is a 2023, 19 page opinion from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 May 2020, 5:54 am
Pulley v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:50 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 11:10 am
For an interesting example of a situation in which the doctrine of curative admissibility (or a doctrine like it) should apply even though an opposing party did not introduce inadmissible evidence, see the opinion of Judge Merritt, concurring in part and dissenting in part, in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
Here is a case from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:01 am
Expert certainty was not required for handwriting expert, as the expert opined that only a few documents were "definitely" authored by the defendant, some were "probably" authored by him and no "definitive conclusion" could be reached on the balance; any questions concerning the degree of certainty went to the weight of the evidence and not admissibility, in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 8:01 am
Case demonstrates acceptance of handwriting expert testimony and application of Daubert factors to assess the reliability of expert testimony, in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 6:40 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in a case involving free speech rights of high school students. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Fact witnesses were able to show failure to comply with professional standard of care, and jury could disbelieve defense experts, in United States v. [read post]
