Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 6,811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 9:30 pm
Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
SL, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Council [2010] EWHC 3182 (Admin) A rolled up permission and substantive judicial review hearing on the issue of whether the local authority owed a duty under s.21 National Assistance Act 1948 (as amended), with the complication that NASS had accepted a duty to accommodate in the meantime. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
SL, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Council [2010] EWHC 3182 (Admin) A rolled up permission and substantive judicial review hearing on the issue of whether the local authority owed a duty under s.21 National Assistance Act 1948 (as amended), with the complication that NASS had accepted a duty to accommodate in the meantime. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Basketball superstars Jordan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:05 am
We are pleased to welcome the latest in our series of reponses to the judgment in A, B & C v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 1:40 pm
In a recent decision, Wilson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:23 am
The case was Vicente v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:23 am
The case was Vicente v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
(David Allen Green in his Jack of Kent blog explains the reference to Pressdram v Arkell if you are not aware of the meaning.) [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:38 am
Jakob Pichon has published Internationaler Strafgerichtshof und Sicherheitsrat der Vereinten Nationen: Zur Rolle des Sicherheitsrats bei der Verfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen durch den IStGH (Springer 2011). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:49 am
This section provides that property tax refunds are to be paid “to the owner of the land as shown on the tax roll on the date that the adjustment is made”. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:47 am
Then watch the arguments next week before the Supreme Court in Kentucky v King. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:10 am
In Jacquelin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
We are pleased to welcome the latest post in our series of responses to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in A, B & C v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 6:48 am
Now enter Manger v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:32 am
Code 552.108) in a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
