Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 7,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:42 am
Bryan Hughes of Mineola and Democratic state Sen. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:05 pm
In Griffin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
AMP v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
How much do we trust courts v. signals from the PTO? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
To identify PMEs, and to distinguish them from operating companies, the researchers turned to (i) public lists of known operating companies, (ii) the companies' websites, (iii) court filings, state incorporation records, patent assignment records and external entity description; (iv) company press releases, (lack of) evidence of operating status and address (or its identity with that of the litigation counsel). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:05 am
At their core, all of these proposals exacerbate existing stigmas associated with receiving public assistance, and create unnecessary hurdles for families that are already struggling just to get by. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 12:05 pm
Rather, these lawyers take the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Cleburne, Texas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 6:09 am
Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
While “core” Al Qaeda leaders like Dr. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Thus I was pleasantly surprised when, last month, up popped a new decision by the New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest appellate court — addressing a core issue under Section 62 of New York’s ancient Partnership Law permitting a partner to dissolve the partnership unilaterally if “no definite term or particular undertaking is specified. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:34 pm
You might have thought the case, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:49 pm
Last year, a district court refused to grant a preliminary injunction after finding that the broadcasters had been unable to distinguish Aereo’s system from a system held not infringing in the earlier Second Circuit decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
Courts overwhelmed by unrepresented litigants 10:51- Good progress — several states enact legislation that earmark returns from filing fees to legal services. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:10 am
Yesterday, we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Supreme Court in a case called United States Agency for International Development v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:06 pm
This calls to mind the old Supreme Court case Bradwell v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
The core difficulty for the challengers to Michigan’s Proposal 2 is that a majority of the current Supreme Court would not view a state constitutional ban on affirmative action as reflecting animus. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:59 pm
In other words, they "committed" their crime while they were in prison, so the Sentencing Guidelines views them as harder core offenders and increases their sentence. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:20 am
Florida v. [read post]
