Search for: "State v. Davis " Results 5361 - 5380 of 6,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, which prohibits public-sector unions from charging nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:35 am by Rob Merges
That trail was blazed by Learned Hand in his celebrated opinion in Parke-Davis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:50 am by Matt Danzer
Circuit’s recent decision in Hatim v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The saga of Kim Davis continues, with the Sixth Circuit affirming that the former county clerk of Rowan County, Ky. does not enjoy qualified immunity for refusing to issue marriage licenses in the wake of Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Rouhandeh, and Michael Kaplan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Bonds, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Misconduct, Rule 144, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Volkswagen 2019 Proposed Amendments to DGCL Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal… [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
California, Davis, School of Law; Adrienne Davis, U. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On Sunday, Guido Fawkes released a preview of Alastair Campbell’s evidence to the Inquiry, stating that he had acquired it by “legal means”. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 11:52 pm
            When this Court adopted the dominant purpose test, it did so in response to a similar move by the House of Lords in  Waugh v. [read post]