Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 9,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
As the reader may recall from other “Watch Your Language” articles for this Blog, because of this judicial deference to “commercial language”, you must say what you mean, precisely, or a judge will decide what you meant.Apparently, the plaintiffs in the recent Supreme Court of Ohio case, Alford v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Although the federal district court and U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Labour Law: Grievances; PrivacyYork Region District School Board v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 12:11 pm
First, the Court GVR'd Box v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
See State Oil Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
App’x 944 (10th Cir. 2012) (joined opinion) “grant of COA did not preclude affirmance of district court order enforcing procedural defaults” United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:01 am
Flanders v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 9:56 am
Instead, in conclusory fashion, the district court stated that nationwide relief is warranted simply because district courts have the authority to impose such relief in some cases and because such relief has been applied in the immigration context. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
United StatesDocket: 11-972Issue(s): In the context of a First-Amendment-protected contribution to an issue advocacy campaign, whether the McCormick v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:53 pm
Although the Supreme Court in McConnell v. [read post]
Former North Dakota women’s health clinic files amended complaint challenging statewide abortion ban
13 Jun 2023, 11:02 am
The Supreme Court overturned Roe with Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:16 am
The EEOC can include claims arising from information learned during a reasonable investigation of the charges, explained the court (EEOC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am
” The court also distinguished its prior decision in Red Wing Shoe Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
West, appointed to the Western District of Oklahoma by President Jimmy Carter, applied the Court's judgment in Samantar v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 am
The idea that federal courts do not issue advisory opinions is one of the oldest established principles in the federal judicial system, but some state supreme courts are authorized by state constitutions or state law to issue advisory opinions. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am
The Court also looked at certain judicial rules of construction in deciding how to read the language about “wires, cables, microwave, or other communications channels. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
[Not selected for inclusion in the Official Reports, decision affirmed by the Appellate Division, 48 A.D.3d 564]In this action, State Supreme Court Justice Gerald Loehr, in an exercise of judicial discretion, imposed sanctions on Scott L. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm
By the logic of the Supreme Court’s reigning Second Amendment case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
We reviewed it, and were somewhat taken aback that – after the court in Desiano v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The case is about whether challenges to a federal regulation known as the “waters of the United States” rule must be filed in federal district courts. [read post]
