Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 28,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Pirani v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 1:38 pm
Howard County, Maryland has become the first jurisdiction in the state and one of few places in the country to pass a mandatory “bird-friendly design” law for new construction of privately owned buildings. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
In December 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in a standard essential patent (SEP) appeal involving Ericsson and TCL Communication Technology—a closely watched case that many thought would shed light on what constitutes a FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) offer of a licensing royalty rate relative to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
In December 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in a standard essential patent (SEP) appeal involving Ericsson and TCL Communication Technology—a closely watched case that many thought would shed light on what constitutes a FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) offer of a licensing royalty rate relative to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to that threat.In light of the foregoing, I hereby determine and order:Section 1. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 12:37 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
Ass’n of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
For instance, in light of Mark Graber’s pathbreaking study of Dred Scott (a work too many constitutional scholars have apparently not yet read), a good example is simply accepting the Republican critique of that infamous decision as if there were no case to be made against African American citizenship prior to the adoption of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 5:52 am
Anders, and Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:35 am
LebanonNidaa Al Watan Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
In light of the objections of the CJEU to U.S. domestic laws and safeguards, Privacy Shield 2.0 may never arrive or we could be we waiting for quite some time. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:02 am
Schrems to reformulate his complaint in the light of the declaration by the Court that Decision 2000/520 was invalid. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:29 am
In Cook v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
In Tidwell v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:20 pm
The Committee also does not discuss recent precedent, such as NIFLA v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Dear Readers:Just recently, the Eleventh Circuit largely overturned the District Court’s decision in US and State of Florida ex re Ruckh v. [read post]
