Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 5361 - 5380 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm by Jayesh Rathod
This case, which will be argued on Monday, marks the third time since 2018 that the court has tangled with the stop-time rule, with previous rendezvous in Pereira v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:57 pm
" He does the tiniest bit of digging and discovers that the trial counsel for defendant (Mark Stein), while no longer with the PD's office, is still a member of the Bar. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
NCAA and the Future of Sports Gambling by Mark Brnovich Internet Sales Taxes from 1789 to the Present Day: South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
The Court of Justice of the European Communities handed down its decision in Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, supported by Vfw AG, Landbell AG and BellandVision GmbH, nearly 26 months after the ruling of the Court of First Instance which this 198 paragraph decision upholds.For those whose memory may not instantly recall the decision of 24 May 2007 or the facts that led to it, let the IPKat recap ...The German… [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
S. 183, 187 (2006) (per curiam) (remanding to agency based on failure by Court of Appeals to "appl[y] the ordinary remand rule" (internal quotation marks omitted)); INS v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Joe Consumer
Yesterday marked the 19th anniversary of 1993 terrorist bombing of the World Trade Center. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Joe Consumer
Yesterday marked the 19th anniversary of 1993 terrorist bombing of the World Trade Center. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At LaborNotes, Donnie Killen lists several ways in which Mark Janus, the plaintiff in Janus v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bruce Fischer, Esq., P.C., 78 AD3d 1016, 1018 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Arnav Inds., Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Daytona Beach News-Journal, Mark Lane discusses Lozman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld a district court ruling that California state officials cannot enforce “slack fill” label and packaging requirements under state law because they are preempted by the federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) and the federal Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA).Remember how the FMIA and PPIA have language prohibiting any regulation of “marking, labeling, packaging or ingredient requirements … in addition to,… [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In the trademark case of Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Education Week, Mark Walsh discusses yesterday’s denial of certiorari in Morrow v. [read post]
This post is based on a Gibson Dunn Alert by Mark Perry, who co-authored the amicus brief for the Independent Directors Council in Jones v Harris. [read post]