Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 11,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Detention: In Ali v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
(As enacted, RFRA also provides religious exceptions from state and local laws, but the Supreme Court held that aspect of RFRA unconstitutional in 1997 in City of Boerne v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Seven Justices found that the text and history of the Appropriations Clause favored the Bureau. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (seven times); and Wetzel v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:32 pm
See Government’s Supplemental and Amended Sentencing Memorandum, United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:21 am
In today’s case (Barsaloux v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
App’x 513 (5th Cir. 2013); Spiral Direct, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Pro 35(a), the district court had a strict seven-day window in which it could resentence a defendant. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
The Court rendered the decision, Jones v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
Treppel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Lenard v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
See also Markell, Amicus Curiae Brief in Favor of Respondent, Bank of America v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, No. 97-1498, United States Supreme Court, October Term 1997 (filed August 17, 1998).But I'm still in search of another source: I could swear that somewhere in the work of Mr. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm
United States, the climate lawsuit brought by 21 youth plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
The case is Probert v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 8:16 am
The case is Gerlach v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:00 am
“In State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:44 am
The case is entitled Smith v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
From the Ninth Circuit's decision yesterday in Fox v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:51 pm
In keeping with the spirit of one case on the docket, FCC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
WSJ Bad (for) genes, too: Lawyers at the American Civil Liberties Union see the high court’s unanimous decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
