Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 40,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2007, 11:53 am
Caban-Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
The First Department held otherwise in its March 19, 2015 decision in Buckingham v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
Use in Commerce The court actually addresses this factor explicitly, a vast improvement over the garbled words in Playboy v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
“If not in this case, then the words justiciable in principle are… empty words. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:24 am
”) State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
When the United States Supreme Court ruled in Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:18 am
This principle is illustrated by Minister of Police and Others v Silvermoon Investments. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
Lord Reed emphasised that the only principles which allow for the plain meaning of a statute to be circumvented are (i) that statutory wording can be given a strained meaning to avoid absurd or perverse consequences and (ii) even greater stretching of plain wording can be allowed where there has been a clear drafting mistake. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:19 am
In other words, the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 12:15 pm
Case Citation: Toth v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:48 pm
It is interesting that Scalia withdrew the dissent after Stevens made changes to the wording of the majority. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
But this is a different matter in light of one word: discovery. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:58 am
On October 15, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
