Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 5361 - 5380 of 16,391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
Most interesting is the possibility that in return for stronger ties the EU might have effectively waived the application of its strong business and human rights measures to EU Cuba bilateral relations. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:30 pm
” But this year — emboldened by the Trump administration’s attacks on reproductive health care access and the changes on the Supreme Court — states are taking direct aim at Roe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
After the 5-4 "decision" last month in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v County of Onondaga, State Supreme Court Judge Donald A. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 8:10 pm by Sean Hanover
The Appeals Officer further cites to Glara Fashion Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
 Fortunately, the Oregon Supreme Court recently put some strong limits on disorderly conduct prosecutions where a suspect allegedly tailgated another car, and called out some choice words to passersby, all over around a five-minute period. blank">Oregon v. [read post]