Search for: "Styles v. State" Results 5361 - 5380 of 5,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
” Platt continues, in dry Satyriconista style, “I guess this must mean that if you do anything at all which upsets delusional wackos, you are not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
Roberts, whose career arc was steadily and predictably upward from high school to the Supreme Court, affects a technocratic, nearly antiseptic, judging style. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm by Jacob Fishman
At a juncture when both democratic and authoritarian regimes across the world are vested to persecuting their host Muslim populations, The New Crusades interrogates–through trenchant analysis and direct testimony of Muslims on the ground–how Islamophobia stands as a unifying global thread of both state and societal bigotry. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris
Graced with a felicitous prose style and steeped in legal history, much of his scholarship had been devoted to the modernization of the law. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
The Chancellor stated that only because the font is chipped, it may be removed and destroyed. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:20 am by Florian Mueller
For one example, let me refer you to Philip Elmer-Dewitt's article on how I was right and mainstream media were wrong on the March 1, 2013 Apple v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:59 am by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without a Handle” – Mobile Tools This post continues my thoughts on qualities of digital tools that have helped make political and artistic expression more subjective, accessible and fluid. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting case from a New Jersey family court, decided in August, but just released for publication earlier this month, D.G. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
The original filing was not styled as a motion, and the government has not replied to Baluchi’s response, but Judge Pohl wants to know if the briefing on that issue is complete—a different motion concerning the constitutionality of the rule allowing the admission of that same hearsay evidence is on the docket, and he’d like to address them together. [read post]