Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 5361 - 5380 of 8,484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Shanahan Jr. et. al (PricewaterhouseCoopers), Is It Time for the United States to Consider the Patent Box? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:11 pm by Matthew Bush
SymczykDocket: 11-1059Issue(s): Whether a case becomes moot, and thus beyond the judicial power of Article III, when the lone plaintiff receives an offer from the defendants to satisfy all of the plaintiff's claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense BarMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The plaintiffs have two main arguments, which they summarize: The Act improperly authorizes that civilians in the United States be detained indefinitely by the military, that they be tried by military commission or military court and that they may be subject to removal to other jurisdictions in violation of the Amendments V and VI of the Constitution. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:20 am by Deborah Pearlstein
And one of our greatest sources of intelligence about al-Qa’ida, its plans, and its intentions has been the members of its network who have been taken into custody by the United States and our partners overseas. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:46 am
Ever since the US Supreme Court ruled in Morrison et al v National Australia Bank Ltd et al that claimants not residing in the United States or American citizens who purchased shares on a foreign exchange can’t settle or litigate their case in the US, these parties have been seeking other jurisdictions to get their claims resolved. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Law Lady
TUSCAN RIDGE, LLC, et al., Appellee. 5th District.Contracts -- Real property sale -- Assignment agreement -- Ambiguities -- Trial court did not err in finding that agreement for assignment of sale and purchase agreement, which included provision of an additional purchase price to be derived by multiplying specific dollar amount times that number of lots approved by county having dimensions of 70' x 120' which exceeded 166 lots, was ambiguous with respect to approved lots… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:12 am by Sheldon Toplitt
In her 19-page decision in Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
    So, do you remember the article I posted the other day about accounting for a pool of loans and how values are based on assumptions about the performance of the pool into the future? [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
United States Senate Armed Forces Services Committee, et al., No. 11-1098 (previously discussed here). [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The Mississippi Supreme Court's decision in In re Hooker et al, which ruled on the State's challenge to the recent gubernatorial pardons, reads like a civics lesson directed to State Attorney General Jim Hood. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am by christopher
The publishing and academic worlds are watching the clock tick down to the perhaps historic decision of federal judge Orinda Evans in Cambridge University Press et al v. [read post]