Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 5361 - 5380 of 21,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am by Burton A. Padove
That does not necessarily mean plaintiffs were without any options for recovering damages, but it does mean those damages will not come from the state government. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
The plaintiffs are seeking “an unprecedented expansion of judicial power,” Roberts says. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
First, the  Court held unanimously that at least some of the plaintiffs had standing to raise the relevant claims. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Plaintiffs argued that the survey compared two versions of the same page—which is true; the survey does effectively test whether the disclaimer does any work to change the meaning consumers take away from the pie charts/diminish the message that the procedure is medicallyeffective. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:38 am by Nassiri Law
They are among 10 sexual harassment plaintiffs to whom The Sacramento Bee reported the state had paid some $25 million over the course of three years just to settle claims. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 12:00 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Background The Langes engaged the plaintiff, (called “Mission” in the reasons) to build a home near Calgary. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 10:01 pm by Doug Austin
  Today, we’ll walk through an example of how you can test and refine a search using sampling. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs argued that Alfasigma continued to advertise a continuity between new VSL#3 and the De Simone formulation, and ExeGi’s CEO provided uncontradicted trial testimony that this false claim was hampering ExeGi’s ability “to leverage the benefits of the brand,” so money was inadequate. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:24 am by Sharifi Firm, APC
California law follows the “substantial factor” test in determining cause-in-fact. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiffs argued that the Ninth Circuit had expressly applied the Second Circuit’s Absolute Activist standard (that is, the “irrevocable liability” test) which, the plaintiffs contend is the governing standard in the Second Circuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 8:46 am by John Jascob
This petition asked whether a private securities-fraud plaintiff may establish the critical element of loss causation based on a decline in the market price of a security where the event or disclosure that triggered the decline did not reveal the fraud on which the plaintiff’s claim is based. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:35 am by Daniel S. Blynn
At the end of the day, the test for what is and is not “advertising” under the JFPA still remains somewhat subjective by requiring a look into the “relative size” of the advertisement. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[10] There is no doubt that class action treatment has lucrative benefits for both defense and plaintiffs counsel — “half of the nearly $23 billion in securities claims costs in the last five years has gone to plaintiff and defense lawyers. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
Batterton, Alito writes for the court that a plaintiff may not recover punitive damages on a claim of unseaworthiness. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:28 am by Scott R. Anderson
The second “nature, scope and duration” prong of the OLC test, however, may impose some more substantial limits. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Protecting agreeable speech is easy, but our freedoms are put to the test when some find it to be controversial. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:27 am by Michael Stokes Paulsen
Thomas made five votes for interring Lemon’s “long-discredited test. [read post]