Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard" Results 5361 - 5380 of 7,749
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am by Transplanted Lawyer
She couldn't help but know that she would probably come under significant personal attack for her ruling and no doubt some of the same people who suddenly became whizzes at legal procedure after the Perry v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 2:53 pm by Ilya Somin
When the Supreme Court rejected Texas' lawsuit seeking to overturn the election results in Pennsylvania and other swing states last month, many people probably thought we have heard the last of the Supreme Court's "original jurisdiction" over cases filed by one state against another, for a long time to come. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Yet public opinion ultimately shifted decisively in favor of same-sex marriage, and in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am by Laura Coogan
  He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:34 am by Kevin Goldberg and Karyn K. Ablin
The “per performance” royalty rate applicable to Commercial Webcasters and to any “excess transmissions” by Noncommercial Webcasters (those occurring after the webcaster has exceeded 159,140 aggregate tuning hours in a given month) will also remain the same: $0.0018 per performance (as we have noted in the past, this equals 18 cents for every 100 people that hear a given song (or 18 cents for every 100 songs heard by one listener)). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am by lawmrh
More than a decade ago, a report submitted to the Arizona State Bar Board of Governors from the Lesbian and Gay Taskforce revealed that 77% of judges and attorneys in Arizona had heard disparaging remarks against gays and lesbians. 47% had heard them in public areas of the courthouse. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:41 am by Matthew David Brozik
CMI was “founded in 2006, has offices in Chicago and New York City, and employs 42 people. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
 On March 19, 2007, the United States Supreme Court heard this "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case, formally known as  Morse v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers in 2001 and Rapanos v. [read post]