Search for: "Thomas Read" Results 5361 - 5380 of 15,696
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 2:27 pm by Lara Fowler
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Alito, Kagan and Gorsuch. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:44 am by Kathleen Scott (US)
Stokes, partner in the Norton Rose Fulbright office in Austin, Texas Mark Thomas Oakes, partner in charge of the Norton Rose Fulbright office in Austin, Texas Steven Howard, partner in the Norton Rose Fulbright office in New York John J. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The headline read, “He gave a $125K gift to Jefferson, expecting it would help get a marijuana growing license. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:07 am
Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: What do you think? [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In a concurrence, Justice Thomas cited a case holding that foreigners outside the United States lack Fourth Amendment rights as one of several grounds that he thought sufficient to defeat the plaintiffs’ claims. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
My reading of Gill is that it puts the federal judiciary on a glide path to ending the national injunction. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
According to Roberts, there was no clash between Trump’s broad reading of 1182(f) and the INA’s nondiscrimination provision; the two provisions occupy “different spheres. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
The court also called the plaintiff’s reading of Section 1182(f) “remarkably cramped” and concluded that a fair reading of the statutes would enable the president to impose additional restrictions on entry beyond the ground set in the INA. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm by Mark Walsh
Breyer is going to read part of his dissent, and there is no confusion about that, as there was yesterday. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
  This is one of the principal differences between Gorsuch and the other three "dissenters":  Justices Alito, Thomas and Kennedy insist that CSLI records do not trigger the Fourth Amendment because they are not the modern-day equivalent of the customer's "papers or effects. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Thomas wrote a dissent concerning the increasing use of nationwide injunctions. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
He was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Gorsuch):As I read the historical record presented to us, only courts could hear patent challenges in England at the time of the founding. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm by Adam Levitin
I'm not going to try to parse through the analysis in the case here, but suffice it to say Justice Thomas's opinion reads like the sort of just-so arm-chair law-and-economic analysis that the academy has largely moved beyond. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:19 am by Kevin Goldberg and Peter Tannenwald
Bush, joined by liberal Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Breyer; conservative-leaning Justices Thomas, Alito, Kennedy, and Gorsuch dissented. [read post]