Search for: "Thomas View" Results 5361 - 5380 of 12,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2016, 3:48 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 These questions were raised for me by the fascinating comment by Thomas Munro on this blog post, which is itself defending the idea of Sci-Hub as civil disobedience. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm by Amy Howe
  All of the Justices were relatively subdued, and two – Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas – did not ask any questions at all. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
“His ability to form deep, lifelong friendships with people of varying views. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
But much of the coverage and commentary related to yesterday’s arguments focused on Justice Clarence Thomas, who ended a decade-long period in which he did not ask any questions. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Justices Scalia and Thomas filed concurring opinions. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Seth Barrett Tillman, in the Baltimore Sun, on whether Ex parte Merryman speaks to whether Taney’s statue (right) should remain on public view Paul Finkelman on HuffPo on whether Ted Cruz is a “natural born citizen. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:17 pm
However, a review of Australian case law demonstrates that there is a significant disjunct between the academic view of comity and its actual use in judicial practice. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Newman, Esquire of the Pittsburgh, PA office of Thomas, Thomas & Hafer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”That view, which was quickly echoed by other Republicans, does not pass the laugh test. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
For a somewhat sympathetic discussion of his tenure with the East Indian Company, see chapters 16, “Utilitarianism and Bureaucracy: The Views of J.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by Patrick T. Ryan
  And while Justice Thomas concurred in the judgment that an unaccepted offer was not enough, he wrote that he would construe Article III’s case-or-controversy requirement by looking to the common-law rules of tender – which he concluded required that a defendant actually produce the sum of money being offered. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by Patrick T. Ryan
  And while Justice Thomas concurred in the judgment that an unaccepted offer was not enough, he wrote that he would construe Article III’s case-or-controversy requirement by looking to the common-law rules of tender – which he concluded required that a defendant actually produce the sum of money being offered. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm by Old Fox
Unlike the rest of them, the archbishop was neither greedy nor devious; he sought nothing for himself, alone was willing to plead for those who fell into disfavour (a service he performed with equal courage and futility for Sir Thomas More, Anne Boleyn, Thomas Cromwell, and others), and miraculously retained Henry’s goodwill throughout. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 8:35 am by Ilya Somin
Carol Brown analyzes some of the implications of Justice Clarence Thomas’ dissent in Kelo, which in my view, is much stronger than Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s better-known dissent. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:41 pm by Adam Klein
During my term, we frequently found ourselves aligned with the three female justices in criminal cases, either in a four-Justice minority or a slim five-vote majority made by Justice Thomas or Kennedy. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:55 pm by Kevin
(As of 2012, anyway; Thomas did generate one (1) laugh the following year.) [read post]