Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 5361 - 5380 of 10,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2010, 5:13 am
Arizona, a United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:11 am by Erin Miller
  The controlling Supreme Court precedent is United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board acknowledged the ruling in Imperial Holmes Corp v Lamont (1972) on the application of section 101 to architectural drawings. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:46 am by Jason Rantanen
Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2009) (suspension of writ of habeas corpus unconstitutional); United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am by Marcia Coyle
The Democratic Party platform that election year called for the overturning of Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am by JB
"And even if the Supreme Court is fixated on Citizens United, a united citizenry might decide to focus on the actual words of the Constitution themselves.The Guarantee Clause says that the United States shall guarantee to the states a republican form of government. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm by Bart Torvik
The Solicitor General wrote the court to inform it that the previous brief had been submitted on behalf of the United States, and that no agency-specific briefs would be forthcoming. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
While issues of state responsibility tend to be foregrounded usually those miss two significant points, (1) that exporting sates appear to be able to act with impunity and the receiving state appears to bear the greater responsibility to prevent-mitigate-or remedy (e.g. here; and here); and (2) little attention is paid to the micro-issues of human consequences (e.g., here). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 8:30 am by azatty
At the reception, the AAABA board will present the proclamation to Fred’s son, Ken – a well-known speaker on the Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]