Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 5361 - 5380 of 10,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2007, 5:18 pm
This applies to China too, a jurisdiction which seems more sensitive to foreign criticism than the United States is.Merpel says, true - but statistics can be dangerous if left to themselves. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
" (Humeyra Pamuk and Simon Lewis, "Biden's democracy summit: Problematic invite list casts shadow on impact," Reuters (7 November 2021) ("'If the summit is to be anything more than just another meeting, each attendee, including the United States, will need to follow through on meaningful commitments on democracy and rights issues in the year ahead,"'said Annie Boyajian, vice president for policy and advocacy at Freedom House, a non-profit… [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
App developers “Bang-ed” up over trade mark dispute http://t.co/J2g6RKiz28 -> Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Fails–Allied Interstate v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm by Olivia Cross
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:04 pm by paperstreet
  The non-Catholic Russian Grand Priory became known as The Ecumenical Order, and it had its first meeting in the United States on January 10, 1908. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which empowers the president to bar entry of foreign nationals who would be "detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:08 am by New Books Script
: critical reflections on the status of irregular migrants in Europe and the United States edited by Marie-Be? [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Executive Power After United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 7:23 pm
Akanoc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejects appeal in AdWords antitrust case: Person v Google (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple - USPTO rules Apple’s claims against Daniel Kokin over use of the mark ‘Video Pod’ should be decided at trial (Ars Technica) Tata Sons – MakeMyTrip (India) files suit against Tata… [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
AMORPHOUS https://t.co/S8NVGY0uEG -> Meaning of RMI in DMCA reviewed in TOMELLERI v ZAZZLE https://t.co/Kk5HQJReIV -> Personal jurisdiction founded on selling server loaded with Iinfringing software to State EPIC TECH v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH(The 1709 Copyright Blog) ECJ: upholds ‘compulsory licences’ of Green Dot trade mark: Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (JIPLP) ECJ: Manifest inadmissibility of reference for preliminary ruling in Canon Kabushiki Kaisha (C-181/09) (Class 46) (IPKat) Bud court asks ECJ: what is ‘acquiesced’? [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Goldstein, 6 NY3d 119 [Court of Appeals of New York [2005]. . .; accord Matter of State of New York v. [read post]