Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 5361 - 5380 of 6,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am by Cannabis Law Group
However, the restriction of cannabis sales is within the purview of local communities, per Prop 64 (the measure voters approved in legalizing recreational use marijuana). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:51 am by SHG
This isn’t exactly a new problem following the Court of Appeals holding in People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg reports that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 1:55 pm
 Here’s the abstract: The question presented to the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm by Tung Yin
Riley challenged this action as racially discriminatory under Batson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:21 am by Kashmir Hill
There, it earned Taj a threat of disbarment…After Taj’s “Honest and Honorable” motion, Oladiran v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:31 am by Taylor Daily
In a notable segment which echoed the words of South Carolina Party Chair Jaime Harrison, Cuomo stated that the Republican argument of wanting to “take us back to the old days, the good old days” would take us back to a time “before the Civil Rights Act … before minimum wage and worker protection laws … before Roe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 7:04 am by Eric Goldman
Prior CCPA/CPRA Posts * CCPA Definitions Confuse the Judge in a Data Breach Case–In re Blackbaud * A Roundup of CCPA Court Decisions (I Only Know of 7) * CCPA Data Breach Lawsuit Against Walmart Fails–Gardiner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:49 am by Steve
If at such regular session or any subsequent special session of that General Assembly the proposed amendment or amendments shall be agreed to by a majority of all the members elected to each house, then it shall be the duty of the General Assembly to submit such proposed amendment or amendments to the voters qualified to vote in elections by the people, in such manner as it shall prescribe and not sooner than ninety days after final passage by the General Assembly. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:42 pm
"  Given this choice, voters (in the case of elections) and citizens more broadly (with respect to judicial role) tend to prefer the second viewpoint. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:21 am by Big Tent Democrat
From the legal perspective, I think Herbert Spencer's identification with the concept was most famously raised by Justice Holmes' dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in the Washington Examiner, Mark Grabowski argues that the justices’ comments during oral argument in Packingham v. [read post]