Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
" But the judge's order didn't give any reasons; and Doe's memorandum, which must have provided various reasons that did sway the judge (whether or not he endorsed them all), had been filed under seal. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
” Vince Fumo and Ruth Arnao’s lawyers don’t have the facts. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:58 am
I don't think they gave me a good reason or a truthful reason for terminating Ms. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
Finally, in the “don’t listen to what judges tell you” category we have Louden v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 10:52 am
"Many DAs may feel it's pointless to go forward with executions at this point - because you know the litigation is going to happen, it may likely get stayed, and we don't know the reason why. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 10:03 am
If your system has a bot on it, you don't get on the internet," Winkler said, summarizing his proposal. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:25 pm
Nonetheless, as a broad generalization, I don't think I'm entirely out of line to suggest that judges are not ideal executive branch managers. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 4:55 am
Because this blog is about the law, the facts of the case really don’t matter. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 pm
You don't need to harp on every aspect, but you certainly want to pound home your points on the important issues. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 10:05 pm
We certainly don’t have to go out and take six months of discovery to establish that for you. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
That bipartisan support means Democrats don’t consider him to be a highly controversial nominee. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
I don't know if they technically fit the definition of "patent trolls," but I'm going to use that term because they have sued more than 80 defendants in the past three years over patents supposedly covering "online transactions. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
On a close read, many parts don’t say what they might initially appear to say. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
Except sometimes they don't. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
& Others [2015] EWHC 2760 (Ch), a 6 October 2015 decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, has attracted a lot of attention on account of its subject matter: the sparkling white wines on which British consumers spend a disproportionate amount of their money in the opinion of at least one member of the Kat team who prefers dry red wines that don't go up your nose when you try to drink them. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 5:30 am
From Judge Jessica Clarke's opinion Monday in Delgado v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:01 am
APPELLANT: I wouldn't hurt a fly. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 1:47 pm
But my understanding is that Apple isn't letting other stores offer iPhone apps, so the defendant pool should be a nullset. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:05 am
(You know there’s a reason why everyone has that “RTs don’t = endorsements" in their bio!) [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
I don't know why it seems there are a lot of female agents working child porn cases, but folks accused of these crimes seem to be really willing to talk to them. [read post]
