Search for: "***redding v. County Court"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2015, 10:12 am
(Retired Employees Association of Orange County v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in cases G 2/12 (Tomatoes… [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:46 am
The case was dismissed on summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Chapothat v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in cases G 2/12 (Tomatoes… [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Sherman v Town of Chester, 2015 WL 1473430 (SDNY 3/31/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Retaliation [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in cases G 2/12 (Tomatoes… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
Page 3 1 (Crim Ct, Kings County, Cyrulnik, J.), quoting People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm
(Specifically, this court notes the absence of any reference in the DIR to the bruises, redness, and swelling that allegedly resulted from the defendant pulling the complainant's hair.) [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am
RAYMOND SALAMONE, Defendant 2009NY033570Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* Taste of nature in court as plant growers slug it out over red radish patentAfter tomatoes and broccoli [on which see David's Katpost, here], it's now the turn of patented red radishes, which the District Court of Hague addressed in a recent decision covered here. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, The second case was City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Finally, it is unsettling to see Jack positively refer to Bush v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS [warning language shown in red color]Sec. 74.451. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:43 am
The case is PP v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:00 am
That’s the question presented in Warren County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:13 am
He is, in many of our opinions, one of the top Family Trial Court jurists in California, and especially within the Los Angeles County Superior Court, and he is immensely likeable and even funny. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
The case is PP v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:27 am
The cardinal rule in workers' compensation has always been, control of the medical is control of the case.Those in work comp litigation understand this concept very well, on both sides of the fence.A recent Illinois case is demonstrative.In Bob Red Remodeling Inc. v. [read post]
