Search for: "4th District Court of Appeal"
Results 521 - 540
of 6,909
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Jul. 1, 2015), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) held that the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act preempted claims under the UCL and False Advertising Law concerning the labeling of Neutrogena sunscreen. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm
” Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals recently answered this question in Stone v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
In the first post-Gentry decision, the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division One) affirmed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to a clause in an employment contract. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Jun. 27, 2013), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) affirmed an order denying class certification of UCL and CLRA claims. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Oct. 16, 2013), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) reversed an order denying class certification of various wage and hour claims. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
In In re BCBG Overtime Cases, 163 Cal.App.4th 1293 (Jun. 13, 2008), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) approved the filing of an evidentiary, preemptive motion by the defendant to deny class certification â€â [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
June 30, 2014) sums it up: In this appeal, we consider whether a federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction to consider certain... [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Riverside County Sheriff's Department v Astrid Megan Reynolds, Court of Appeal [California], 4th District, Division 2, Docket #E043187 Astrid Megan Reynolds served as a deputy sheriff with the Riverside County [California] Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Cingular Wireless, LLC, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 18, 2008), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) held that an administrative regulation (specifically, a provision of the California Code of Regulations) can provide a Cel-Tech "safe harbor" for conduct that might otherwise violate the UCL. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 24, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) affirmed an order denying class certification in a case involving alleged misclassification of workers as independent contractors. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
April 8, 2011) G042799, the Fourth District Court of Appeal held that an insurer may obtain reimbursement for a settlement from an insured when it is determined the underlying claim is not covered by the policy, provided the insurer follows the three part test laid out in Blue Ridge Ins. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
District Court for Maryland was ... [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
Smith, 70 F.4th 198 (June 6, 2023). [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:14 am
., 2022 WL 34141 (4th Cir, 2022) Nina Lynn Nowlan appealed the district court’s order granting Bryce Gerald Randall Nowlan’s Petition for Return of the Child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (May 25, 2012), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) affirmed an order striking class allegations from the complaint. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:24 pm
On May 23, 2018, the 4th District Circuit of Appeal denied a separate motion by the attorney general for a stay to suspend the ruling, but ordered the plaintiffs to show cause why the appeals court should not overturn the ruling in 25 days. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:27 am
Unfortunately for the plaintiff, the Fifth District Court of Appeal never reached her argument. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:46 am
Town of Dunkirk, 221 A.D.3d 1581 (4th Dept 11/17/23). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Buzzard, 1 F.4th 198 (June 11, 2021). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 12:53 pm
District Court held that these connections to public funding did not make the hospitals "instrumentalities of government" for equal protection purposes.However, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which reviewed the District Court's opinion for error, reversed the lower court's opinion a year later. [read post]
