Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 521 - 540
of 10,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:04 am
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) et al v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:55 am
In Cheeks v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:53 pm
By Andrew C. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:34 am
First, in CSL Plasma Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 6:19 pm
A cross moved to: disqualify the F law firm; appoint a receiver; appoint a successor trustee in place of C of the B Family Trust; hold a hearing on whether a guardian ad litem should be appointed for G; strike D's reply in support of her motion to dismiss and strike C's reply in support of her motion to dismiss. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm
A cross moved to: disqualify the F law firm; appoint a receiver; appoint a successor trustee in place of C of the B Family Trust; hold a hearing on whether a guardian ad litem should be appointed for G; strike D's reply in support of her motion to dismiss and strike C's reply in support of her motion to dismiss. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:33 pm
The New York City Department of Education may discontinue the employment of a probationary teacher pursuant to Education Law §2573(1)(a) at any time and for any reason absent the teacher's establishing that "the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith”* (Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763, 765 [1988]; see Education Law §§ 3012-c [1],… [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:33 pm
The New York City Department of Education may discontinue the employment of a probationary teacher pursuant to Education Law §2573(1)(a) at any time and for any reason absent the teacher's establishing that "the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith”* (Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763, 765 [1988]; see Education Law §§ 3012-c [1],… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 8:45 am
J., joined in all but Parts II-D and III-B, in which Kennedy and Sotomayor , JJ., joined in all but Part II-E, in which Thomas , J., joined in all but Part III-B, and in which Breyer , J., joined in all but Parts II-C, II-D, and II-E. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:30 pm
Less commonly, you may receive guidance about (a) which of these liability exposures are (or may not be) covered under your directors’ and officers’ liability insurance (D&O) policy and (b) how well the standard D&O cover tracks and responds to emerging executive risks. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
B. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:57 am
LEXIS 79460 (D. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
This is the conduct that R.C. 955.22(C) and (D) were designed to protect against. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:57 pm
Somers v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Boies cited Romer v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 9:46 am
Hilton, Paul Vézina et Claude C. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Put differently, the SG does not (and cannot) maintain that A literally cannot exist without B, C & D. [read post]
