Search for: "ANSWER OF THE JUSTICES TO THE COUNCIL"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
Schedule II lists, among others, the president and vice-presidents of the National Assembly, administrative justices of the peace, members or commissioners of various public bodies (such as the Access to Information Commission, the Administrative Labour Tribunal and many others), public inquiry commissioners, arbitrators appointed by the Minister of Labour, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General, government lawyers or lawyers under a legal services contract with the… [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:53 am
Even the national Court (Justice Arnold) that had sent the preliminary questions to the CJEU in that case, complained that the answers of the CJEU (the infamous “It follows” of par. 25), in reality, did not “follow” from the legal grounds of the decision. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:18 pm
Although four of the justices disagreed with minor aspects of the opinion for the court by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, all of the justices rejected the rulings imposing that requirement. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
Associated Press LimitedDecision Date: February 11, 2021 The High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, granted summary judgment against the defendant in relation to the misuse of private information for publishing a letter sent by the claimant to her father. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 3:19 am
Yet, City Manager Boganey was hard at work doing everything he could to placate the demands for “racial justice. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The Justice Department is investigating whether Gaetz paid for sex with women in violation of federal sex-trafficking laws. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 9:25 am
To the extent possible, the capacity for a more individualized or specialized response will exist within the more general feature, described by the paper prepared for the Council of Europe (to which I referred in my previous post) as “develop[ing] mainstream solutions with built-in adaptability and compatibility”. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
So far, the answer has been, no. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 7:54 am
This position answers directly to the Northern Arapaho in-house counsel. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:48 am
The answer is Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence from DHS v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 7:30 pm
Justice Brown’s concern was that the majority’s approach abandoned any meaningful constraints on this national concern branch of POGG power. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Not surprisingly, both the majority and dissenting opinions failed to do justice to the depth of Navy knowledge of the hazards of asbestos, Navy control over the workplace, and the futility of warning of asbestos exposure to the Navy, which had superior knowledge of both general asbestos hazards, the specific conditions it created, and the methods needed to protect its workers and sailors. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 8:33 am
This position answers directly to the Northern Arapaho in-house counsel. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:45 am
Lady Arden gave the sole judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Either way, there is no written component, such as short answer or long answer questions. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:49 am
The FCC has confirmed this in answer to questions by Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:47 am
The FCC has confirmed this in answer to questions by Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
According to the case law of the Enlarged Board, a point of law is of fundamental importance if the answer to it goes beyond the individual case at issue and will be relevant in a potentially large number of cases (G 1/12, Reasons, point 11).2.1 In the Board's view it appears self-evident that the point of law addressed in the question below is of fundamental importance for an indefinite number of cases. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 12:39 am
Si hay una inminente fuente de litigios contencioso-administrativos, esa es la responsabilidad patrimonial derivada de la asistencia sanitaria. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:14 am
Laws adopted by the NPC or NPCSC are regarded as national laws, whereas local laws include legislation enacted by Hong Kong’s Legislative Council and the common law applicable in Hong Kong. [read post]
