Search for: "APPLICATION OF SMITH"
Results 521 - 540
of 7,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 6:58 pm
Dennis Saylor in federal court in Boston is a victory for Smith & Wesson Brands Inc (SWBI.O), Sturm, Ruger & Co (RGR.N) and others accused of undermining Mexico's strict gun laws by designing, marketing and selling military-style assault weapons that cartels could use. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
On Monday 13th March and Tuesday 14th March the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Officer W80) v Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct and others, on appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 1301. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am
., “Shame, John Smith”—à la Cersei’s Walk of Atonement on Game of Thrones. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc., 828 F.2d 1567, 1571, 4 U.S.P.Q.2d 1141, 1143 (Fed. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 12:52 pm
In our most recent YouTube video, we have in depth discussion with paralegal, Alyssa Smith, to discuss the roles of paralegals in personal injury cases. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
The copyright owner in Runt is seeking to enjoin director William Coakley from releasing a behind-the-scenes project about alleged on-set bullying and sexual harassment that it claims he fabricated. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
On Wednesday 8th March 2023 the Court will hear R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, on appeal from [2021] EWHC 3013. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
While the decision represents a first-of-its-kind application of the so-called Howey test to the offer and sale of NFTs, the court itself acknowledged that the facts presented a “close call” and stated that its decision is narrow and based on the specific facts before it. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant’s costs. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
First, it is likely that Special Counsel Jack Smith and the grand jury want to ask Pence questions that fall outside the scope of his legislative capacity. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:10 am
If you want to read even more about this, Reed Smith did a terrific FAQ on the subject that I highly recommend. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council [2023] UKSC 8, in which the Court will determine when a local authority sells land which is subject to a statutory trust for public recreational purposes without complying with the relevant statutory requirements, does that trust continue or end? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
Indeed, the Hewitt en banc majority had a heterodox makeup: Ho, Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:32 am
Reed Smith will continue to monitor the bill and any future developments in the digital accessibility space [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:32 am
Reed Smith will continue to monitor the bill and any future developments in the digital accessibility space [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
I will be presenting a paper on the evolution of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on the conflict between free exercise and free speech claims on one hand and neutral, “generally applicable” laws like anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:38 pm
Reed Smith will continue to track developments related to this proposed rule, including its potential finalization later this year. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:56 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
