Search for: "Advocates v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 12,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2022, 12:24 pm by Howard Friedman
In an Order (full text) signed by four of the seven Justices on the Louisiana Supreme Court in June Medical Services, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:52 am
The advocate general stated that "an owner/insured who was not the driver of the vehicle is indeed to all intents and purposes a 'third party' protected by that provision". [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:51 pm
For the Advocate-in-Chief of ObamaCare© v?. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 9:00 am by Tom Smith
One of the newest members of the Pontifical Academy for Life appointed by Pope Francis is an outspoken advocate of abortion rights, having recently shared her opposition to the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:02 am
Office of Family & Children, and Child Advocates (NFP) Jill Baird v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Becerra (challenge to California law requiring “crisis pregnancy centers” to convey state-prescribed messages), Lozman v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:08 am by Youngjae Lee
Louisiana (no death penalty for nonhomicide crimes) and Roper v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) This morning, the Supreme Court agreed to hear three cases, and all are First Amendment cases: National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:59 am by Aimee Oakley-Runyan
  There has been much speculation about how Dodd-Frank changed the federal preemption landscape, with national bank advocates claiming very little change and state bank advocates claiming it would be more difficult for national banks to preempt state consumer laws. [read post]