Search for: "Arizona v. California"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2011, 9:25 pm
Arizona Department of Corrections, 2011 U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:47 pm
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
Brown v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
Attorneys for the prisoners in Tennessee, Arizona and California argued before U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
See Walker v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:10 am
I tried to tell them that the Arizona/California method of requiring the jury to be unanimous one way or the other was the way to go, and they blew me off. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Moreover, and more importantly, the logic of the Arizona case (which the Court said was in the same vein as that of Smiley v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:59 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Arizona v California gave the Secretary the right to reduce different states’ allotments to river water based upon drought conditions. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:55 am
Jay Wallace (University of California, Berkeley)12:45-1:05pmCommentaryPekka Väyrynen (University of California, Davis)1:05-1:45pmDiscussion SessionEND OF CONFERENCEAgain, conference registration is free but required for attendance. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:30 pm
A California federal district court held that plaintiff had alleged viable Eighth Amendment, Equal Protection and RLUIPA claims, but not a free exercise violation.In Marr v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 3:32 pm
LEXIS 48804 (D AZ, July 5, 2007), an Arizona federal district court rejected a prisoner's challenge to a jail's policy of allowing only three detainees per week to attend religious services.In Al-Barr v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed Bennett v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:31 am
v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
But in Georgia v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 4:34 am
See Arizona v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
If the BJR is ultimately held not to protect good faith decisions by officers of California based banks, that holding would extend to officers of any California corporation. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Bennett (consolidated with Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am
The Associated Press (via the Chicago Tribune) reports that a group representing an Arizona sheriff is seeking $60,000 in donations to file an amicus brief in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
On October 1, 2019, plaintiffs in Brackeen v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:11 am
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.htmlPetition for certiorari was denied in this case on 12/9/19: California Trout v. [read post]
