Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 521 - 540
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2008, 7:27 pm
See Adkins v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
In re: Prempro Products Liability Litig. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 11:16 am
Typically, MassTortDefense will post about significant opinions issued on product liability issues. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Asbestos comes to mind with respect to increased risk claims. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
Solicitor General for the federal government’s views on state authority to require railroad employees claiming damages from asbestos exposure to offer proof of medical condition before they may sue under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 12:06 pm
” Sinclair v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:12 am
Sether v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
S.C., 419 F.3d 568 (6th Cir. 2006) (finding plaintiff implanted with allegedly defective device had standing to pursue product liability claim based on theory of increased risk of harm, despite lack of present injury, and to seek medical monitoring remedy). [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
"Products Liability is generally considered a strict liability offense. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
When an asbestos manufacturer sold asbestos to a sophisticated intermediary -- the Navy -- the manufacturer could be absolved of liability for the Navy's failure to warn its employees of the product's danger. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 1:50 pm
STANDARD, INC., last week, holding that a sophisticated user defense applies to product liability actions. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 9:03 am
Thorpe Insulation Company was a distributor and installer of asbestos insulation products. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:40 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:46 pm
This is the biggest decision we've seen in a product liability case in quite some time. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:33 pm
...to have an asbestos-related product liability claim. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
GARZA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
Ford Spared Liability for Defect in Retrofitted Truck Rear Bumper
New Jersey Law Journal
Ford Motor Co. is off the hook for an $11.8 million product liability judgment in a crashworthiness suit over a chassis cab's faulty rear bumper safety device. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 1:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 2:17 am
Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
