Search for: "Ashley v. Ashley"
Results 521 - 540
of 951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/LIq05PHeTf -> High court rules data retention and surveillance legislation unlawful http://t.co/qAmhpf1yGj -> Privacy class action update: appeal allowed in Condon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:31 pm
” Meshell v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-07-22 http://t.co/qiIh1oaG00 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-07-22: Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-07-21 http://t.co/pz0rz… http://t.co/4vXramlWOY -> The 7th Circuit just made it a lot easier to sue over data breaches http://t.co/ea57g6xn3X -> When officers a reliable for publishing defamation Kent v Postmedia Network Inc, 2015 ABQB 461 http://t.co/WH99e2QUBp -> Will Ashley Madison customers launch class… [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/UiGXXelsjt -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-07-20: Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-07-19 http://t.co/A4oBF… http://t.co/aT0I6xAW4v -> Clickthrough Agreement Upheld–Whitt v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:22 pm
On Wednesday 8 July 2015, data protection practitioners gathered at a seminar organised by the Society for Computers and the Law (“SCL”) to discuss some of the important issues arising from the CJEU decision in Costeja v Google with leading experts in this area, including Anya Proops of 11 KBW, Ashley Hurst and Dan Tench of Olswang and Jan Clements of the Guardian. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/LIq05PHeTf -> High court rules data retention and surveillance legislation unlawful http://t.co/qAmhpf1yGj -> Privacy class action update: appeal allowed in Condon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am
” Ingrid Wuerth linked us to her new commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:59 am
The moral to this Ashley Court Right to Manage Company v De-Nuccio case is that the fine details of the consultation regulations really do matter and it is the prejudice that can be suffered by the tenants that the Tribunals will consider in deciding whether or not to allow full or partial recovery, not the size of the actual mistake made by the landlord in complying with the regulations. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
PBM Products, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 11:16 pm
PBM Products, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:20 am
Design Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
NLRB to brass: please don’t sell workplace data to telemarketers or use it to “harass” or “rob” employees [Joe Perticone, IJ Review] “Direct evidence must … wait for it … exist to matter in a discrimination case” [Jon Hyman on Butler v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Louis V. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:30 pm
The conversation around EEOC v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:27 am
Freedom Act, preventing lawmakers from heading home for the Memorial Day weekend,” the New York Times’ Ashley Parker said in her day-after analysis. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from Ashley Hogan of JURIST. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:45 am
In Gee v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
This issue did not need to be decided upon in CG v Facebook Ireland because the DPA was found not to apply. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
For example, in Quinton v Peirce & Cooper ([2009] EWHC 912 (QB)), where a DPA claim was added to libel and malicious falsehood claims, Eady J said: “I must now turn to the Data Protection Act. [read post]
