Search for: "Auge v. Auge"
Results 521 - 540
of 8,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2018, 2:49 pm
v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:01 pm
Lukas v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
In McBride v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:13 pm
The distinctions that we draw in search and seizure jurisprudence are sometimes such fine ones.The Supreme Court says that "headlong flight" plus "narcotics area" plus "has a bag" lets you search. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:54 pm
This is precisely what I expected once I read the facts.What the band Green Day did at one of its shows (and at the MTV Music Awards) did indeed constitute fair use. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:21 pm
This is a really well-written and well-reasoned opinion. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:58 am
You may have an IQ of 88. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:12 am
My predominant reaction to this opinion was one of nostalgia. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:50 pm
As a person keenly interested in litigiation strategy, I very much enjoy it when the Court of Appeal not only issues opinions that generate opportunities for tactical behavior, but also goes ahead and gives tactical pointers. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:47 pm
I'm probably in the middle between Judge Betty Fletcher -- who seems certain that there's error and that it's not harmless -- and Judge Milan Smith, who seems certain that there's neither error nor harm. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
From the outset of the opinion, it's not looking good for the defendant. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:28 am
One of the topics that I do not cover at length in my first-year Civil Procedure class is when parties have a right to a jury trial. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:21 am
I'll merely recite the relevant facts of this case without (much) commentary. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 12:05 pm
Today's ten-page opinion can be accurately be summarized by saying: "The statute says you can't appeal here. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:54 pm
I bet that when you're a district court judge who's granted a motion to suppress, you like it when the Ninth Circuit affirms your decision. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
Earnest Tilley was under the influence of methamphetamine -- a bad idea in general, but particularly bad for someone (like him) diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia -- when he entered a Tractor Supply store, took $200 worth of items without paying for them, and pushed a female employee to the wall when she attempted to stop him from leaving. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Sometimes even someone as jaded as I am can't believe what I'm reading:"Appellant Charles Patrick Drew sexually assaulted Amber Oceja while she was in a diabetic coma, and within two hours of the assault, Oceja died from diabetic ketoacidosis. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 11:56 am
Can you sometimes attribute changes in the composition of a particular judicial tribunal with the difference between life and death of a given criminal defendant? [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 4:53 pm
Normally I wouldn't comment on this case, as it's very fact-specific, and concerns whether a particular real estate option contract was detailed enough to justify the trial court's award of specific performance. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:02 pm
I talked earlier today about the Ninth Circuit's new "hunter exception" that permits suspicionless seizures. [read post]
