Search for: "B. Smith" Results 521 - 540 of 5,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 (December 2, 2019).Thomas Burrell, The Bill of Rights before the Civil War: State Sovereignty, Strict Construction, and the Presumption of Constitutionality, (Forthcoming, 14 Charleston Law Review).Katherine Shaw, Reva B. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
Successful quarterbacks are treated as rock stars (indeed quarterback, Tom Brady, here, from the New England team, is married to Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bündchen, here). [read post]
On the one hand, one could read Marcus Smith J’s decision in relatively narrow terms. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 11:28 pm by David Smith
The post Not Bare Licencees by David Smith appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 2:49 pm by C. Fraser Smith
Hard to know what’s happening with the $1.5 billion State Center project. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 11:42 pm by Tessa Shepperson
B&B for homeless families Legally families shouldn’t be in them for more than 6 weeks. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 8:23 am by Steven Cohen
., Inc. d/b/a Sniper Treestands –  United States District Court – Southern District of Illinois – March 31st, 2017) involves a tree stand that collapsed. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 8:23 am by Steven Cohen
., Inc. d/b/a Sniper Treestands –  United States District Court – Southern District of Illinois – March 31st, 2017) involves a tree stand that collapsed. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
Smith might never get her website up and running, or that (b) same-sex couples would never actually request her services, or that (c) she would discourage—strongly—said couples, but not actually refuse them service. 1. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm by Marty Lederman
In two recent posts, I argued the following about the upcoming Hobby Lobby case, which will be argued on Tuesday morning, March 25th:(i) that, contrary to the assumptions of the plaintiffs and many federal courts, there is in fact no legal duty for the owners of Hobby Lobby and other employers to do anything their religion allegedly forbids--namely, offer the company's employees a health-insurance plan that includes contraception coverage, since there is no legal duty to offer an employee plan in… [read post]