Search for: "BELL v. BELL" Results 521 - 540 of 5,136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2021, 11:31 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Writ of actual innocence — Motion for reconsideration In 2004, a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County found Edward Bell, appellant, guilty of first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder, and two counts of use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 2 – Copyright Enforcement: Faye Fangfei Wang, Resolving Copyright-related Cases Over the Internet with the Assistance of Artificial  Intelligence in Europe Automated notice and takedown/Content ID with appeal mechanism as an example of how the new European rules are supposed to work. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 10:47 am by Administrator
Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 [1] This appeal and its companion cases (see Bell Canada v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
In addition, the Court further developed its fair dealing framework adopted in CCH v Law Society (CCH),  Alberta (Education) and SOCAN v Bell Canada (SOCAN). [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
Epic released a software update for Apple iOS devices on 13 August 2020 making the Fortnite’s virtual currency (called V-Bucks) available for purchase through its own website, in addition to Apple’s App Store, at a 20 per cent discount. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
The Appointment and Removal Litigation System July 27, 2021 | Bernard Bell, Rutgers Law School The Court’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:00 am by Dennis Crouch
  That approach was in place for a number of years and only began to crumble with the Supreme Court’s decision in  Bell v. [read post]
A blaze of recent publicity, and a great deal of legal maneuvering, has turned on the issue of the conservatorship of Britney Spears. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:05 am by Guangjian Tu
In Huatai P&C Insurance Corp Ltd Shenzhen Branch v Clipper Chartering SA, the Maritime Court of Wuhan City granted the maritime injunction upon the claimant’s application to oblige the respondent to immediately withdraw the anti-suit injunction granted by the High Court of the Hong Kong SAR to restrain the Mainland proceedings. [7] The Hong Kong anti-suit injunction was successfully sought by the respondent on the grounds of the existence of a valid arbitration agreement. [8]… [read post]