Search for: "BROWN v. SCOTT" Results 521 - 540 of 772
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Morris My Personal Best: Life Lessons from an All-American Journey by John Wooden with Steve Jamison The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs The Horse’s Mouth by Joyce Cary In the Shadow of the Law by Kermit Roosevelt One L: The Turbulent True Story of a First Year at Harvard Law School by Scott Turow Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
In contrast, Lord Scott, Neuberger and Brown argued that D2 should have been liable: if the aim was to punish the victim then the method was of less relevance than the purpose. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
HACKER AND PAUL PIERSON New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2011, c2010 HN89.S6 H33 2011 See Catalog Carbon offsetting -- Law and legislation CARBON TRADING LAW AND PRACTICE / SCOTT D. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
HACKER AND PAUL PIERSON New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2011, c2010 HN89.S6 H33 2011 See Catalog Carbon offsetting -- Law and legislation CARBON TRADING LAW AND PRACTICE / SCOTT D. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” Randall Scott Jones v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:00 pm by Dan Markel
Richard Kluger, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:45 am by Jeff Gamso
 But occasionally its other things.Consider the Alford plea.The name comes from North Carolina v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:59 am by Walter Olson
More reactions to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Yesterday the US Supreme Court, on a narrow 5-4 majority, ordered the state of California to reduce prison crowding because of inadequate medical care in a case style Brown v. [read post]