Search for: "Baker v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 3,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2009, 6:53 am
Greenberg v Mallick Management, Inc., 527 N.E. 2d 943, 949 (Ill. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v Metropolitan… [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cayzer v Beddow [2007] EWCA Civ 644 (29 June 2007) Beckett Investment Management Group Ltd & Ors v Hall & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 613 (28 June 2007) Hall & Anor v The First Secretary of State [2007] EWCA Civ 612 (28 June 2007) Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Mackie [2007] EWCA Civ 642 (28 June 2007) South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council v Anderson & Ors [2007]… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF also granted review in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
The IPKat posted a report earlier this week of the case Hospira v Cubist, in which three patents belonging to Cubist were revoked by Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 5:11 pm
... 2005, Constance Baker Motley, Senior Judge on the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Christie v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:56 am
State of Indiana , a 12-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Here, we reach an age old conclusionâ€â [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am by Lovechilde
  Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, Robert Carter, Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, and others litigated all around the country in their efforts to take down Plessy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:04 pm
  The failure to disclose the Baker patent, the rejections in the related application over the Baker patent, and the allowances support a finding of inequitable conduct. [read post]