Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am
Rather than look at comments as a whole, or (as with some of the Facebook cases) the effect of banning, the court looks at discrete aspects of Twitter functionality as it relates to banned and muted users. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
The case is: County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am
Adam Winkler is a professor of law at the University of California at Los Angeles. [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:29 am
Here is their masthead: Motherless banned child porn, bestiality, and infringing files, but tolerated other UGC. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Seven states have passed laws banning disability discrimination in organ transplant determinations, so that people with disabilities cannot be disqualified from receiving a transplant based on their disability alone if that disability is not medically relevant. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Justices contemplate ‘travel ban’ v. 3. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:29 am
Varela, the justices will review a dispute that arose when Frank Varela, a Lamps Plus employee, tried to file a class action in California, alleging that a data breach at the company had broken various state laws. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Prior blog post. * Search Engine Land: 3 inconsistencies in Yelp’s review solicitation crackdown * NY Times: Attacked by Rotten Tomatoes * New Yorker: Improving Workplace Culture, One Review at a Time * Quigley v Yelp: A rare case interpreting the Consumer Review Fairness Act & California’s law banning anti-review clauses. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:49 am
-based company to turn over the stored electronic data, but it also provides ways for companies to challenge such orders under certain circumstances. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
In California, the public accommodations law led to the end of a ladies’ discount at a car wash in Koire v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Last summer, tech companies followed suit, with CEOs including Elon Musk signing an Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Chemical Weapons. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
Richard Hasen is the Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
Supreme Court to overturn an Obama-era rule banning uranium mining near Grand Canyon National Park in the latest push to open up public lands to industry. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
The Florida Senate has approved an action which could ban warrantless location tracking or stingray usage. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm
Supreme Court in the 1994 case Staples v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 10:25 am
There’s nothing illegal about a high-level employee moving from one company to a competing company (especially in California, which bans non-compete agreements). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am
At Take Care, Brianne Gorod argues that the oral argument in Janus v. [read post]
