Search for: "Barns v. Barns" Results 521 - 540 of 2,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 6:44 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court won’t revive Kansas voting law requiring proof of citizenship (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court takes sides in interstate river flow fight (Pamela King, E&E News) Supreme Court puts off ruling on Trump census case to exclude undocumented immigrants (Pete Williams, NBC News) Why Trump’s attempt to steal the election was too much even for Republican judges… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes invites readers to “reflect on the fact that — once again — folks had to sleep on the sidewalk for days to see or hear the Supreme Court at work,” waiting for up to four days to gain access to the oral argument earlier this month in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:10 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Barrett was trustee at private school with anti-gay policies (Michelle Smith & Michael Biesecker, Associated Press) Supreme Court split in Pa. election case raises questions about how a Justice Barrett would rule (Seung Min Kim & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court’s Pennsylvania mail ballot ruling tees up test for Barrett (John Kruzel, The Hill) Poll: Majority says Senate… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Provenzano v Cellino & Barnes, P.C. 2022 NY Slip Op 04749 Decided on July 27, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department we see an illustration of the “no harm-no foul” spirit of legal malpractice. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who reports that Sotomayor said she “looked forward to a nomination that will restore the court to full strength. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:08 am
The decision of the Supreme Court in Watters v. [read post]