Search for: "Bill Reynolds" Results 521 - 540 of 711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 12:15 pm by Bradley Coxe
” The language of the Bill, proposing to add a new section to Article XIV, is as follows: Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 21 March 2012, the Supreme Court gave its long awaited judgment in the Reynolds qualified privilege case of Flood v Times Newspapers, (heard 17 and 18 October 2011). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
He said the president’s inaugural committee, a tax-exempt charity, improperly paid a bill it did not owe, using nonprofit funds to pay a bill owed by a for-profit business. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by David Kopel
Professors need not take the firm position that the bill is definitely unconstitutional; professors who acknowledge that the bill raises serious and unresolved issues are also welcome. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Reforms of libel law generally are being considered by the Government and a bill is being drafted. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:55 pm
My first position as an attorney was at Hamilton Brook Smith & Reynolds (then in Lexington, now in Concord). [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:31 pm by Ruth Carter
I hope to influence the State to pass a bill that will allow non-binary birth certificates and driver’s licenses next session. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In the statute, HB 215, the Bill Blackwood Law Enforcement Management Institute of Texas (LEMIT) out of Sam Houston State was charged with creating a model policy, with input from law enforcement and special interests like my employers at the Innocence Project of Texas (I participated in their working group as part of my day job). [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Kelsey Lee
For example, former Nevada governor Brian Sandoval (R) signed a bill that would make it cheaper for homeowners to install and use rooftop solar panels and also signed several other clean energy bills. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:52 pm by Charon QC
” I missed this excellent story from RollonFriday.com… worthy of Dr Strangelove of Muttley Dastardly LLP… Exclusive: RPC lawyers publicly shamed if they don’t bill enough Lawyers at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain can tell how effectively their colleagues are billing from the colour of their computer screens. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 4:04 am
Glenn Reynolds, the Instapundit, links to a free-marketeer/libertarian rant against universal health care coverage. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 8:23 am by Kevin Kaufman
The bill accomplishes this aim over time using tax triggers which set base collections of $700 million per year. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
The bill, which was based on a tax commission recommendation, passed with bipartisan support. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
  Although certain parts of the claim were unarguably comment, Tugendhat J dismissed the application for summary judgment on justification, comment and Reynolds privilege. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
On the contrary as Professor Mullis and others have pointed out, all the major changes in recent years have been in favour of the media: the development of Reynolds privilege from 1999 and its strengthening recently in Jameel; the introduction of the offer of amends procedure, and the ability of the Court of Appeal to control the award of damages by juries. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Elon Musk’s Starlink Expands Across White House Complex DNyuz – Maggie Haberman, Kate Conger, Eileen Sullivan, and Ryan Mac (New York Times) | Published: 3/17/2025 Starlink, the satellite internet service operated by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, is now accessible across the White House campus. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am by Jasmine Joseph
The Bill of Right’s Establishment Clause commands in plain terms that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” but the legal interpretation and political implications of the Clause remain contested today as ever before. [read post]