Search for: "Blakely v. Blakely"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2018, 11:20 am
Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815, 818 (1988); Atkins v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 12:37 pm
Washington, 2004, limiting admission of out-of-court statemens by absent witnesses; Burton is about retroactivity of Blakely v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
" This quoted language comes from the panel's per curiam ruling in US v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
See Blakely v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
He raised other valid claims, which resulted in his case being remanded for resentencing in a post-Blakely world. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:12 pm
Blake v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
Blake, United States District JudgeHolding: Tort claims based on conduct prior to the execution of a contract are not outside the scope of the agreed to forum selection clauses and that enforcing said clauses, which refer to “any legal action” related to the agreement.Facts: In 2013, Defendant, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (“Old Dominion”) entered into an Equipment Purchase Agreement (“Alstom Agreement”) with Defendant Alstrom Power, Inc. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Hanson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:10 am
’ ” Haynes v. 1st Nat. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
SCHLAG v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 pm
Tilley; Tamiz v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that were not… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
Causes of action that accrue under state law prior to the filing of a bankruptcy petition, as well as those that accrue as a result of the filing, are property of the estate (see Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. v Alvarez [In re Alvarez], 224 F3d 1273, 1277-1278 [11th Cir]; Winick & Rich, P.C. v Strada Design Assocs. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 4:41 pm
Waddington (05-9222), which "considers whether to make retroactive, to earlier cases, its 2004 decision in Blakely v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:11 pm
” Turtle Island Foods v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:48 pm
Though I wish the ruling was just an April Fool's joke, I fear the a Fourth Circuit opinion today in US v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
Earlier today the Court issued a per curiam opinion in the Texas redistricting case, Perry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:58 am
Blake Reid’s Section 230 Citation Alignment chart: Though Belknap’s terminology was still wrong, it looks like Belknap was closer to “lawful good” than virtually all other Section 230 commentators. [read post]
