Search for: "Boeing Company, TheĀ " Results 521 - 540 of 1,495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” For example, the CEO of Boeing described the effect of tax cuts on aircraft sales by explaining, “No, I don’t see a changing pattern of buying patterns. [read post]
  Dale had piloted Boeing 727 aircraft, but just prior to his deployment had been selected for training as a first officer to fly MD-11 aircraft, at a higher pay grade. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:29 am by Keahn Morris
This decision is one of the first ALJ rulings to apply the NLRB’s new standard for addressing the legality of facially neutral work rules applicable to union and non-union workplaces under The Boeing Company, 365 NLRB No. 154 (December 14, 2017) (“Boeing”). [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Kit Case
Photo credit: The Boeing Company The post The Boeing Company Makes a Big Investment in its Employees With Auburn, WA Training Facility appeared first on Washington Workers' Advisor. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Kit Case
The Boeing Company announced the unveiling of a new cargo air vehicle prototype. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
That’s because, in three separate shareholder proposals submitted to The Boeing Company by three beneficial owners (all working through John Chevedden), the SEC refused to allow the company to exclude portions of the supporting statements that suggested that some of the company’s directors might be “lap dogs. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:47 am by Simon Lovegrove
Among other things, key points discussed include: the contingency plans requested by the BoE from banks and insurance companies suggest there could reasonably be a day 1 movement of around 10,000 jobs, which represents less than 1% of UK financial services jobs. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
" The Board's recent decision, The Boeing Company, subjects the Board to a new standard, which requires the Board to balance an employer's justification for the rule with the likelihood that an employee would reasonably construe the language to prohibit Section 7 activity. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
" The Board's recent decision, The Boeing Company, subjects the Board to a new standard, which requires the Board to balance an employer's justification for the rule with the likelihood that an employee would reasonably construe the language to prohibit Section 7 activity. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 11:57 am by Walter Olson
Some seriously good news, finally, from the National Labor Relations Board, which had hurtled left in recent years but now has a majority of Republican appointees: 1) it overturned its notorious Browning-Ferris rule, which had threatened to impose liability on companies allegedly responsible for the working conditions of employees of other firms, as in franchise and outsourcing contexts; 2) it announced in Boeing Co. that it would drop a standard under which it had found unlawful,… [read post]
Workplace Rules Standards The fourth major decision handed down by the Board last week was The Boeing Company, 365 NLRB No. 154, which addressed an issue with perhaps the most wide-ranging impacts of its decisions thus far. [read post]
Workplace Rules Standards The fourth major decision handed down by the Board last week was The Boeing Company, 365 NLRB No. 154, which addressed an issue with perhaps the most wide-ranging impacts of its decisions thus far. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:54 am by Daniel Schwartz
Applying the new test to The Boeing Company no-camera rule, the Labor Board determined that the rule was lawful. [read post]
”  … In The Boeing Company, also decided on December 14, 2017, the Board adopted new standards for determining whether “facially neutral workplace rules, policies and employee handbook standards unlawfully interfere with the exercise” of employees rights protected by the NLRA. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:52 pm by Mark Theodore and Joshua Fox
  In Boeing Company, 365 NLRB No. 154 (2017), the Board established a new standard for evaluating whether facially lawful workplace rules, policies or employee handbook provisions unlawfully interfere with employees’ exercise of Section 7 rights. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:42 pm by Mark Ross and Keahn Morris
On Thursday, in a decision called The Boeing Company, 365 NLRB No. 154 (“Boeing”), the new Republican NLRB majority articulated a new method for testing the facial validity of work rules, overturning Lutheran Heritage. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:09 pm by Jen Will
In announcing the new standard, in a decision involving the Boeing Company the majority announced that it was providing greater clarity and criticized the prior Board for invalidating “common sense rules and requirements” under the Lutheran Heritage standard. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:09 pm by Epstein Becker Green
”  … In The Boeing Company, also decided on December 14, 2017, the Board adopted new standards for determining whether “facially neutral workplace rules, policies and employee handbook standards unlawfully interfere with the exercise” of employees rights protected by the NLRA. [read post]