Search for: "Brandes v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am by Jani
The case in question was Fenty & Ors v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd, decided in the Court of Appeal in the early days of 2015, which dealt with the sale of a simple article of clothing; a t-shirt. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v… [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:23 am
September 17, 2020 - 2 PM: Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm by Bexis
Thus, to market a generic drug, the manufacturer is "required to produce a drug that was equivalent to the brand-name drug and [is] not free to unilaterally pursue a safer alternative design in order to comply with state law." [read post]
In 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States released its opinion in the case National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:29 am
Today is rumoured to be National Bilski Day in the United States (if you've never heard of Bernard L. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
Although the reasoning is different, the result would be similar to that of the Lanza decision in the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted a defendant’s motion to decertify a class because plaintiff’s damages model was not consistent with his theory of liability as required by the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 11:12 am by Larry
See, e.g., Chrysler v. [read post]