Search for: "Buy Direct, LLC" Results 521 - 540 of 1,106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2016, 5:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Runway Safe LLC, No. 1:15-CV-546, 2016 WL 6087906 (W.D. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
LeadClick Media, LLC, 15‐1009‐cv (2d Cir. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Wilford filed suit against Coltea in 2015, asserting direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and tortious interference. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 11:00 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Matthew W. Modell
Babyganics Sued Over Alleged “Organic” Products KAS Direct LLC, the maker of Babyganics products, has been sued in a federal putative class action filed in New York by consumers alleging its infant products were organic, when in fact they were not. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Golden makes snack foods and does a simple, direct presentation. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:14 am by SHG
Copyright © 2007-2016 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
Hormel, Hormel Law Office, LLC, Spokane, WA)   United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:40 am
Keep an extra car charger or consider buying a portable charging block. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
Specifically, the court concluded, in part, `that Oregon Revised Statutes §260.715(9) is directed at harmful effects. * * * The statute is not directed at the content of speech; the statute prohibits conduct, specifically a type of commerce rather than speech itself. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am by Eric Goldman
” Further, as alleged in the SAC, Bleeping staff members are “authorized [ ] and expected to post in Bleeping’s forums,” and “direct[ed] . . . to recommend and promote certain products for which [Bleeping] receives commissions . . . and to discourage use of other products from which it does not receive commission. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But the court reasoned otherwise: “The failure to direct the reader to the Disclaimer substantially decreased the likelihood that it would be noticed, so this omission could be viewed as indicating an intent to obfuscate the fact that the clinical trials were performed on a product offered by a different company. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:25 am by SHG
And even a fart can get you if done in the wrong direction. [read post]