Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2020, 5:09 pm
AB5 expanded the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
In October, a diverse group of industries experienced adverse court rulings defending independent contractor classification class and collective action cases. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 10:03 am
Recent Discrimination Complaints Against Cannabis Companies On July 29, 2020, in Soule v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 8:38 am
The bill codified the court decision Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
The department brought the case in a Northern California federal court, alleging the deal would eliminate the nascent but significant competitive threat that Plaid poses to Visa in the online debit market. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 1:27 pm
The newest challenge, California v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:02 am
(As we explained here, AB 5 codified and expanded the controversial “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:09 pm
As evident in the exclusions set forth in AB 2257, many industries and professionals in California have asked to be excluded from the ABC test, and ride-sharing companies, such as Uber and Lyft, are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to place Proposition 22 before the California voters this November to exempt the companies from the law. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in, R. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:27 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:48 am
Such jurisdictions include Delaware (the state of incorporation for a significant number of companies) and California (the home of many technology companies targeted by NPEs). [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:48 am
Two recent decisions from the New Jersey Supreme Court, Flanzman v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:48 am
Two recent decisions from the New Jersey Supreme Court, Flanzman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
My report on the PI hearing already stated in its headline that Epic was struggling to persuade the court of its likelihood to win.While the TRO was a pre-PI decision, the PI is preliminary to a hypothetical permanent injunction that may or may not come down after the bench trial to be held in Oakland in May 2021. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
What should companies do if they operate in California and other states using independent contractors as part of their business model? [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:31 pm
This may require security officers to remain on the premises and on call during paid rest periods, and to carry and monitor a communication device… it is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate, for the security services industry only, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:38 am
(Zapata Off-Shore Company v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Empowered by Brown v. [read post]